%402x.svg)
A finance data platform for multi-entity groups, from project-based firms to multi-plant manufacturers. Reconciliation runs as a control on every data load, so month-end no longer waits for the spreadsheets.
From the ERP to consolidated revenue
400
+35
+20
+25
−60
420
Each leg is a reconciling difference with its source named. Illustrative figures, millions.
From two finance programmes: a global professional services group with 324 legal entities, and a global manufacturing group after a major acquisition.
ERP and group planning platform reconciled on every data load, to a one-dollar tolerance. Every difference comes back flagged, with its source.
Statements & Reconciliation, Consolidated Revenue Bridge
One set of KPI definitions, cost categories, allocations and hierarchies behind every P&L and SG&A view, from the certified model, signed off by your internal auditors, through to Excel.
Group Performance, Department & Office P&L, Job & Client Profitability, Entity ROIC
Intercompany eliminations up the full hierarchy, and receivables, payables and work in progress per entity, so locked-up cash becomes cash you can chase.
Work in Progress, Receivables, Payables
The layer underneath all of it: every reported figure traces back to the posting it came from, with an audit trail from day one.
Controls & Data Quality
Forecasts that start from reconciled actuals and sit next to the annual plan and every forecast round, with consolidation and scenario logic automated.
Budget, Forecast & Outlook
Works with
Any ERP (SAP, Oracle, Microsoft Dynamics 365, NetSuite, Infor, Sage, Maconomy), any planning and consolidation platform (OneStream, Oracle EPM, Anaplan, SAP BPC, Workday Adaptive Planning, CCH Tagetik, Board, Jedox) and any data platform (Databricks, Snowflake, BigQuery, Microsoft Fabric, Redshift or on-premise), with Power BI and Excel on top.
You grew by acquisition. Every entity reports its own way, inside a hierarchy nobody drew on purpose.
The ERP says one thing, the group planning platform another, and the difference is reconciled by hand, every month, in spreadsheets. At one group, around 15 people fed the month-end by hand, some for two days a month and some for the whole month.
"Which ten clients generate the most revenue?" takes three weeks to answer.
Every team keeps its own extract, its own copy and its own version of the numbers.
If two of these are true, the rest of this page is about you.
Reconciled numbers
Every entity carries the same code in every system, and the ERP and the planning platform are reconciled on every data load before anything else is built on them.
Cash
Live working capital on the reconciled numbers: receivables and payables ageing, DSO and DPO per entity, work-in-progress ageing and a 13-week cash view.
AI
Natural-language questions and variance commentary on the certified numbers, and forecasts that start from reconciled actuals. Tie-Out: the AI layer as a product for CFO and FP&A →
Why this order: AI commentary on numbers that do not reconcile explains the wrong figure faster.
The "which ten clients" question went from weeks to minutes, and AI now writes the quarterly variance commentary, an estimated 13,400 hours a year handed back. Read the case study →
Month-end from weeks to days, five allocation processes consolidated into one, and shadow reporting retired through certified models. Read the case study →
Six use cases from the catalogue
Intercompany matching, a 13-week cash flow, acquisition onboarding, live working capital, duplicate payment prevention, and price and rate realisation. Each runs on the same reconciled numbers. Get all 33 use cases as a PDF →
Assessment: four to twelve weeks, fixed price, typically EUR 15k to 60k
Workshops at your site with finance, controlling and IT, one system at a time. You get a findings report, a high-level design, a fixed scope, a fixed price and a build plan.
Build: first release in 90 days, full production in six months
At our largest reference. Three-week sprints, a two-week acceptance window per deliverable, and the first reports on a certified semantic model. Already run a data platform? We build the finance data products on it.
Expand: use case by use case
Each use case from the catalogue is a small project with its own business case. You pick the sequence.
What it costs: typically EUR 150k to 600k, depending on entity count, source systems and scope. The assessment fixes the number before you commit to the build.
Your group consolidates anywhere from around 20 to several hundred legal entities.
One or more ERPs, for project accounting or manufacturing, plus a group planning or consolidation platform; after an acquisition, often more than one ERP and some entities on files.
Reconciliation between the two is still done by hand.
Your close is under audit or SOX pressure.
Skip this if you are a single-entity company, you are looking for a dashboard subscription, or you are still choosing your ERP.
No. The method rests on every entity carrying the same code in the ERP and in the planning platform, and we can set that up on any ERP and any planning and consolidation platform.
Access runs through your own identity provider, no passwords are stored in the platform, and every load and change leaves an audit trail from day one.
Yes. We build the finance data products on the platform you already run, inside its catalogue and its deployment pipeline, and we can test the platform itself independently.
Yes. The architecture is the same for 20 entities as for several hundred. Timeline and cost shrink with the entity count.
By week four the platform's foundation is in place, data from your first source system is loading, and the definitions behind the first reports are agreed. The first reports ship with the first release, on a certified semantic model, so the first numbers you see are already certified.
Bring your ERP and your group planning platform. We go through how the month-end reconciliation runs today and where the differences come from, and you leave knowing what a fixed-price assessment would cover for your group. You talk to Michał Dębski, co-founder.
